LONG LOST FAMILY IS SAMEY, PREDICTABLE AND OVERLY EMOTIONAL……BUT I CAN’T HELP STILL LOVING IT! Long Lost Family. New series, episode one review.

Last Wednesday saw the start of series six of Long Lost Family on ITV1.  The show that reunites families after years of separation is samey, predictable and overly emotional, but I can’t help still loving it nevertheless.  For me, it is a feel good programme like no other in terms of its altruistic nature.  Yes, it goes over-the-top at times in terms of its production values in wanting to make us cry almost every other minute, but ultimately this is feel good telly at its finest that deserves more praise than scorn.

In terms of structure, this first episode of series six was identical to all the episodes in series five and four.  It is a format that clearly works but it has become too formulaic as a result. i.e you know how the episodes are going to unfold before even watching them.  Subsequently, this leaves the show wide open to much parody like The X-Factor has in the past with its sob stories.  The difference here though is that the people in Long Lost Family are not talentless wannabies trying to flog the Simon Cowell music brand, instead these are genuine people with genuine stories about their past who it becomes almost impossible not to care about.  As always with this show, Davina McCall and Nicky Campbell brilliantly complimented each other as the presenters.  As usual there were two stories for us to find out about and these interchanged throughout the episode.

The first story we told about was revealed to us as a first on Long Lost Family. Two people who did not know each other had come forward and were trying to locate the same person, namely their natural mother who had given them both up for adoption as babies.   After a DNA match it was confirmed that Cliff Jardine and Sue Ward were indeed half siblings.  Their genuine shared delight upon finding out that each other existed was a lovely thing to witness.  Cliff stated the following,

“Having lived your whole life by yourself and never sort of feeling part of a family, to actually find out I have a family is amazing”.

As their story was told, it was complimented periodically with great scenic shots of the north Devon coast where Cliff was form.  These panning shots served to punctuate the action as well adding a touch of the spectacle to the show.

My hunch was that their Mother must have died by now given that Cliff was fifty-three, sad but highly probable I thought.  I was sat there grinning ear-to-ear as the happy second story had just concluded when I was truly gobsmacked at what I was then reading on screen.  It was in the concluding bit of the show where it detailed an update about the people/families featured.  We were told that Cliff and Sue had eventually found their mother, brilliant I thought(my face still grinning).  However, it went on to reveal how their mother did not want any contact with them for fear of upsetting her family.  I was staggered at this, it’s her own flesh and blood we are talking about here.  I found it impossible to comprehend how this woman could not want to see two of her children after all these years apart.  It definitely left a bad taste in my mouth as the credits rolled.

The second story was had a happier outcome and was the one that NEARLY but not quite moved me to tears.  I actually did not cry at all in this episode which I think is a first for me whilst watching Long Lost Family.  Could I finally becoming desensitized to the sad stories and emotive piano music I wonder, time will tell I guess???  We were told how a twenty-nine year pediatric nurse called Anna from Cambridge, was looking for her Ecuadorian mother.  Anna stated,

“Unless I find my mother I think there will always be a part of me missing”

Anna we discovered had been born in Ecuador but had been put up for adoption and brought over to the UK at the age of two.  Nicky found Anna’s mother in Ecuador and their story reached its happy conclusion when they were reunited with one another at the end. After my utter dismay at reading Cliff and Sue’s mum did not want to know them, it was nice to read at the end that Anna and her natural mother had remained in contact since being reunited.

Like I have already said at the top, this show has become too samey and so I therefore do wonder if the format is becoming a bit tired and stale now as a result. ie boring? That said, I just love watching the human happiness in it though above all else.  In my view, it is this glorious sight of seeing loved ones lovingly reunited with one another that banishes away any of the criticisms that can be quite fairly leveled at it.

Watching Long Lost Family brings a certain amount of happiness into my life that very few other television programmes are capable of doing. It is great to see this TV show once again, IT’S GREAT TO BE REUNITED WITH IT!!!

4/5.

 

Posted in ANXIETY, EMOTION, ENTERTAINMENT, FAMILY, ITV1, POPULAR CULTURE, REALITY TV, THE ARTS, TRUE STORIES, TV, TV REVIEW, UK TV, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SEXY KNICKERS, COMEDY AND 80s NOSTALGIA….’BRIEF ENCOUNTERS’ IS A PLEASING HIT SO FAR! Episode two review of ‘Brief Encounters’.

After a really encouraging first episode of the new comedy drama Brief Encounters last week, I was therefore intrigued to see how this was going to be followed up in part two.   Set in the location of Sheffield(South Yorkshire, England) during the financially hard-up times of the 1980s in Britain, this tells the tale of the lives of four women as they embark upon being Anne Summers Party Plan saleswomen.  ITV1 have a hit on their hands here because I thought episode two was pretty damn good too.

Pauline “Brian, I have been to the pub and I liked it”!

The star of episode one for me was actress Penelope Wilton who plays repressed housewife Pauline, she was the star performer yet again in episode two. To be fair though, I think the rest of the cast needs loudly applauding as well.  You are half way there with a hit show if the acting is first class and it definitely is here. Sophie Rundle(who plays Stephanie) is a fantastic talent and I think ex Corrie’s Anglea Griffin shows just what an underrated actress she is too.

Episode two dealt with the fallout at what happened the end of episode one, namely Stephanie walking in and finding her husband Terry bonking with another woman on the sofa.  This was then made worse for her as she then had to go and do an Ann Summers party at this woman’s house.  Things got worse still for Steph after her childminder(Barry played by Kent Riley) lost her son at the cinema, coupled with then being later slapped across her face by her Mother who deemed her to be an unfit mum for doing the Anne Summers parties.  Am I the only one by the way who rather than her being nasty, expects Stephanie’s Mum to say something funny when she speaks? The actress that plays Steph’s Mum is the brilliant Felicity Montagu, who played the marvelous downtrodden Lynn character in Alan Partridge years ago.

We learned more about the home life of the character Dawn(Sharon Rooney) and her chauvinist, useless Dad and brothers(barring the very young one).  The comedy highlight in this second installment for me was when an appalled Brian(Peter Wright) walked into his bathroom and found Dawn shaving her legs and ‘pits’ with his best razor.  It’s important that we saw not just a funny side to Dawn, otherwise the casting could have been rightly criticized for being too stereotypical, i.e she’s the ‘funny fat girl’, box ticked.

The ending was dramatic as we saw Brian knocked over(dead or not we’re not sure yet) by robbers fleeing the scene of their crime in a getaway car.  The extra juicy bit here being that the driver of said car was Kieran(Don Gillet), namely Nita’s(Angela Griffin) fella. Upon him arriving back home all flustered, she then tells him that she has just decided that she wants to have their fourth child after all what with things now looking more financially secure for them….eek!

1980s nostalgia is key reason as to why this show is a success, or at least why it appeals to me so much.  It was a notable decade where new fashions and music came across to Britain from America.  This was coupled with a Thatcher government in the 80s that saw mass unemployment rise within many parts of the UK(especially in the north).  You had affluent yuppies and entrepreneurs juxtaposed against great civil unrest and public disorder.  It is a striking period of British history that sticks in the memory banks and makes for an interesting backdrop for a comedy drama such as this.

If I am being picky then I guess you could argue that the stuck-up woman(the one whose husband is a friend of Brian’s and who walked out of the Anne Summers party in episode one in disgust) is verging on a caricature, i.e bit over-the-top and too snobby to seem like a real person.  Apart from this character though, I am finding it pretty hard to greatly fault Brief Encounters so far.  The Anne Summers subject matter is an original one and so there is a refreshing quirky feel to the narrative.

All-in-all, so far this show has been a triumph for a ITV1………and .one that I never heard or saw coming either!

4/5.

 

Posted in COMEDY, DRAMA, EMOTION, ENTERTAINMENT, ITV1, POPULAR CULTURE, screenplay, TELEVISION, THE ARTS, TV, TV REVIEW, UK TV, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE JOY OF……..A GOOD LONG WEE, WHEN YOU SUFFER FROM LYMPHOEDEMA LIKE ME!

I’ll let you all into an embarrassing secret of mine for a moment,  the other morning I raced into the bathroom quicker than Linford Christie in tight Lycra and shouted the following OUT LOUD as I weed(in the voice of the late sports broadcaster David Coleman),

“COR BLIMEY, BLOODY HELL, BLOODY HELL…..OOOOOOOH THE JOY, OH THE EXALTATION……THAT WAS QUITE REMARKABLE”(OK, hands up, I never said the last bit).

I promise you that my wee was that long in length that if Record Breakers was still on the telly, then I’d soon be starring in a post watershed version of it.  I stood there post mammoth wee, truly astonished at how much I had just done.  It was good astonishment though.   Hearing and seeing me nearly urinate myself TO DEATH on a daily basis for the last six weeks or so, has been one of the best things that has happened to me in ages….REALLY.  You see, it means that the lymphodema that I suffer from in my both my lower legs is going really well at the moment.  Months ago my legs were huge and a caterpillar peed more than me!

At the age of twenty one, I was diagnosed with a prostate infection and irritable bladder(the latter one I would have for life the doctor told me). At the time I was wanting to urinate literally every five minutes.  It was such an horrific thing to deal with at such a young age but gradually with the help of medication things did improve with my water works.  About ten years later I then had my my gallbladder taken out due to having gallstones.  I can vividly remember having this enormous wee straight after the operation.  It was the colour of Newcastle Brown Ale and went on and on and on and on.  After that though I hardly seemed to wee during the day and I struggled to work out why.

After my gallbladder was removed I then went back to my doctors several times explaining how it felt like my body was being poisoned with something.  I kept on getting these cramping sensations throughout my body but particularly down my arms.  I had blood tests and nothing showed up.  I can remember telling medical professionals how I hardly seemed to want to urinate during the day.  I did not have retention, I just didn’t want to wee and when I did I hardly did any volume.  It got that alarming that I went to urinate out of habit during the day rather than having any real need to go.

Two summers ago I had developed swollen legs from the knees down, my left leg much worse than my right.  After a nasty bout of cellulitis my puffy legs were FINALLY diagnosed as a condition called lymphoedema.  I had never heard of it before never mind could I spell it.   I have blogged in the past how devastated this diagnosis made me feel initially.  I can remember walking back from the doctors fighting back the tears, I could not believe that I now had ANOTHER lifelong health problem to contend with for the rest of my days.

I have PRIMARY LYMPHOEDEMA and there is where you are born with it or just naturally develop faulty lymph glands.  Secondary lymphoedema is where people get it via some damage to their lymph glands/nodes. For example, women who have a mastectomy can often get it in their arms as a result afterwards.  Your lymphatic system/glands play the important role of removing toxins and waste from your body.  With faulty lymph glands in my legs, this therefore explained why I had been getting that poisoning type feeling throughout my body for years.

I was told to wear compression stockings by two Vascular Consultants that I saw.  They admonished me for not wearing them even though I tried to explain to them why I could not.  I suffer with chronic pelvic pain I told them, this as consequence meant anything tight on my legs or feet made the pelvic pain unbearably sore.  I had such a doctor just shake his head at me, I felt like smacking him in the chops such was my anger at his lack of empathy towards me.

Within the last three months I have finally been able to take NSAIDs…non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.  Nausea and stinging sore ribs had prevented me from taking them in the last few years but now I was overjoyed at being able to take them once again for my chronic pelvic pain.  The result was that I was able to get away with it pelvic pain wise, with wearing compression stockings up to my knees on both legs.  Most of the time they were not medically prescribed stockings and instead were just tight long socks from my nearest Primark.

The change in the look of the lymphoedema in both my legs has truly been incredible.   Upon taking the long tight socks off at night, my best leg looks almost normal and my worst leg looks as good as it ever has since being diagnosed.  It was then that I noticed the enormous weeing starting to happen, particularly first thing in the morning after my legs had been raised in bed.  I have never in my life weed as much as I do at the mo(in one go I mean).  For the first time in almost twenty years my bladder feels like it is working properly like everybody else’s.  Got to be honest, it can be a tad annoying to wake up absolutely bursting but if it means my legs look tonnes better then I can certainly live with it.  It is purely down to me wearing tight stocking/long socks, who would have thought they would have made such a brilliant difference to my lymphoedema suffering……QUITE REMARKABLE as David Coleman would say!

HALT RIGHT THERE!!!!!

This blog was meant to end upbeat regarding how my lymphoedema was going, but then around ten days ago I had a big setback which I didn’t see coming whatsoever.  I had just been to see my GP where among other things I told her about how elated I had been feeling of late about the state of my lymphoedema.  I told her an edited version of what I have just revealed to you all here in the above.  I get home and I take my jeans off to put some shorts on and I noticed a nasty red rash on the side of my right shin. I HAD A BLOODY CELLULITIS INFECTION AGAIN.  I could not believe it because my legs had been so good of late, it was a real kick in the teeth.

About nine days on and through strong antibiotics the cellulitis has more or less gone.  My right leg(which is my better lymphoedema one) had ballooned up massively during the course of the week.  Thankfully, as the infection is now going my huge swollen right leg is gradually disappearing too. I was just so gutted to have got cellulitis again after not having had it for over sixteen months.  I can only think I banged my bare shins on a piece of pointed furniture, such as a little table that we have in the hallway.  I’ll have to be even more careful now about watching that I don’t walk into things………another thing to always have at the back of mind!

I guess I just wanted to do another blog about my lymphoedema because I am aware it is a medical condition that not that many people know about.  I wanted to further detail what it’s like to suffer from it and therefore hopefully educate some people along the way.  I was excited to share with all how much my legs have improved in size since wearing these stockings.  Ultimately though, I wanted to share with you all THE JOY OF A GOOD LONG WEE…….WHEN YOU SUFFER FROM LYMPHOEDEMA LIKE ME!!!

 

 

 

 

Posted in ANXIETY, cellulitis, COMEDY, EMOTION, HEALTH, LYMPH GLANDS, LYMPHOEDEMA, mens health, MENTAL HEALTH, NHS, TRUE STORIES, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ENGLAND BATTERED, DEEP FRIED AND THEN GOBBLED UP BY FOOTBALLING MINNOWS ICELAND!! England vs Iceland – A review.

Last night quite rightly could be argued as the worst night EVER  in the history of English football.  In the Allianz Riviera stadium in Nice, England were sent home from Euro 2016 after giving the most abject of abject displays against that very well known footballing nation of…….ICELAND!!! A country with a population the size of Wakefield(as one of the commentators on ITV said last night), somehow they managed to shock the footballing world by beating mighty England.   To use an acting analogy with England’s pitiful display, it was like watching eleven Sir David Jason’s suddenly morph into eleven DANNY DYER’S!!!!

I knew England and especially striker Harry Kane were going to be up against it once ITV pundit Ian ‘DICKO’ Wright said minutes before the game, “I really fancy Harry to nick a couple today, fingers crossed for him”.  In fairness to Ian I too envisaged that happening before the game had started.  I think Ian is a dreadful pundit who huffs and puffs a lot without actually saying anything that meaningful or understandable.  Nevertheless, I thought he had had an OK night last night.  I sat that there to my surprise occasionally nodding at some of his damning criticism of England post match.  I just want Ian to do me a big favour though for the remaining games because this really drives me around the bend, STOP CALLING FELLOW PUNDIT LEE DIXON ‘DICKO’ FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!

Regarding the game, England could not have got off to a better start. Raheem Sterling went over in the Icelandic box after a clumsy late challenge from their goalkeeper and England were awarded a well deserved penalty kick.  England talisman Wayne Rooney stepped up and consummately slotted home the penalty and everything seemed to be on script, for about thirty seconds.  Iceland within seconds equalized after they delivered a long throw in into England’s box which England failed deal with properly via some diabolical defending.  This Icelandic goal was against the run of play though with England being the superior team in the initial stages.

England seemed to be in control without ever being able to make their pressure count with more goals(a reoccurring problem that they had in their three group games).   Then just when you thought England must surely go into the lead again soon, England goalie Joe Hart(Mr Head & Shoulders) had another nightmare in goal.  Iceland shot a pretty tame effort at him but somehow he managed to make a right pig’s ear of it and let it in.  In the words of the famous cricket commentator Sir Geoffrey Boycott, ‘my grandmother could have saved that’, such was the enormity of this rickett by Hart!

In the second half and again I hate to agree with the normally very average ITV1 football coverage, but the England players just seemed to completely capitulate before our very own eyes in the second half.  They all seemed to panic at the prospect of losing to a footballing minnow such as Iceland and the harsh criticism then that would be rightly heading their way afterwards.  It was truly staggering just how poor England were in that second half.  Players could not string two passes together or even just simply control the ball.  Harry Kane took a free kick that went nearer the corner flag than the goal such was the poor nature of it. He also then crossed a ball moments later that was ludicrously over hit, just when England needed some quality from him.  I have never seen him play a game as poorly as that and the same could be said of captain Wayne Rooney.  His performance second half was truly woeful.  He kept giving the ball away and everything he seemed to try went wrong.  Forget eleven David Jason’s turning into eleven Danny Dyer’s, it was that bad it was like watching eleven Bruce Springsteen’s turn into eleven Chico’s. It sadly was Chico time for the England players and on their way out of Euro 2016 England duly went.

During this tournament so far the BBC’s coverage has been far superior to that of ITV’s.  Therefore, I cannot be alone in being irked by the fact that ITV had three out of the four England games, I thought they were meant to be shared?  In fairness to ITV though I did not mind their coverage that much last night.  I thought four pundits was one too many for their last England game so three definitely worked better for me this time, even if they did omit their best pundit Slaven Bilic for some strange reason.  I find Lee Dixon a tad over the top in terms of him doing his stern Alan Hansen impersonation, but overall I thought most of what they said was bang on the money.   I fully agreed with all the pundits that Marcus Rashford only coming on for the last five minutes was a big tactical mistake my England manager Roy Hodgson.  Glenn ‘he’s got to hit the target’ Hoddle doing the co-commentary though still reminded me of tad of Ken Barlow ,i.e dull and boring.  I was just thankful that former Germany great Lothar Matthaus had been given the night off because he is to football punditry to what Bernard Matthews was to vegetarian cooking, i.e hopeless!

Moments after the game it was announced that England manager Roy Hodsgon had resigned, along with his assistant coaches Ray Lewington and Gary Neville.  Roy had nowhere else to go after such a disastrous night for English football.  Whenever the England  football team do badly in a summer tournament you then get these uneducated idiots moaning about how much the players earn and how the players don’t seem to care.  This is overly emotive cobblers and too easy a thing to say.  You could argue them caring too much last night was the main reason why they froze so much with such panic in the second half.  If you compare the current successful England rugby team with the footy team, then it is clear as day that the football team had been badly managed and coached throughout these European Championships.  England lacked a distinctive style of play and the selection of the team looked muddled throughout the tournament.

I read England’s current under 21’s manager Gareth Southgate could be the next England manager. God help us if this happens because for me he’s like the Steve Davis of football, i.e. that former famous snooker player that had less charisma than a tin of sardines.  That said, right now the reputation of English football could not get any lower.  Never thought the England football team would be battered, deep fried and then gobbled up by the Icelandic team.  I will therefore skip a plateful of fish and chips for my tea tonight if you don’t mind because right now…… I still feel rather queasy!

England’s performance – 0/5.

ITV1’s performance – 3/5.

 

Posted in EMOTION, ENTERTAINMENT, POPULAR CULTURE, RANT, SPORT, TELEVISION, THE ARTS, TRUE STORIES, TV, TV REVIEW, UK TV, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BIRTHS, BABIES AND BOREDOM! IN THE CLUB : SERIES 2, EPISODE SIX REVIEW!

In 2008 Gareth McLean in The Guardian asked if there was ‘a TV equivalent of difficult second album syndrome’?  He went on to confirm that indeed there was and cited a few examples to support his theory.  He was referring here of course to when a successful first series of a television programme, is then followed up by a lacklustre second effort.  In The Club has just had a bad case of ‘second series syndrome’ in my view.  Interesting characters and narrative in the first series were replaced mostly with blandness.  On the whole, I found this second helping of In The Club a pretty uninspiring effort I’m afraid!

The main problem I had with episode six(the series finale) was that I failed to find the main dramatic storyline, that dramatic or moving like I was meant too.  This episode centred around the tricky pregnancy of Jasmin(Taj Atwal) who finally went into labour.  Earlier in the series we had learned how one of her twins was smaller than the other and so there was chance it might not survive.  There was the ‘dramatic moment’ when upon examining Jasmin, midwife Vicky could not initially find the heartbeat of smaller baby number two.  Seconds later the tension was defused when it’s heartbeat was found. Rather than being moved by this though I thought it was all a bit overacted and a touch corny.

Still with this storyline of Jasmin and Dev, the next big momentous decision for her was when she decided that she would try and have both her twins via natural vaginal births(thank the Lord I’d recently given up ketchup as I ate a late tea ).  Again though, I thought the scene where Jasmin decided this with Dr Stone was very overdramatized.  Overdramatized and overacted to the extent that I failed to lose my suspension of disbelief, i.e it drew my attention to the fact that they were actresses ‘acting’.

Geraldine(midwife) : “C’mon Jasmin darling, nearly there.  That’s it KEEP PUSHING, KEEP PUSHING. Pretend you’re having a BIG POO”!

We then had the dramatic scene of where Jasmin gave birth to smaller twin baby number two.  My problem with this scene though and with such dialogue in the quote above that I have listed, is that I have now become fully desensitized from any sort of emotion when seeing babies born in TV dramas.   This is primarily because I have seen so many and particularly in this show.  The shock value has gone that much that I found this scene boring and unoriginal rather than being dramatic.  It reminded me of when I used to love that ITV drama about the London Fire Brigade called London’s Burning. Initially, them putting dangerous fires out was really dramatic stuff to watch.  Nevertheless, as time wore on the novelty wore off and it became dull as well as monotonous to watch. This is how I felt about watching babies being born by the end of the second series of In The Club.

I also had issues with the dialogue of Dev(Sacha Dhawan) in this episode.  I get that he is meant to be one of the funnier characters in the show however I found him mostly irritating here.  All this business about him nearly fainting in the delivery room, again it just smacked of unoriginality to me to do this same joke again(it was funnyish the first time but not the second).  I accept I did smirk at his inappropriate timing when he asked Jasmin did she want a snack just as she was about to deliver the baby.  This though was then followed by a corny comment by him as he stated it killed him once going for a poo.  Corny is definitely the best way that I would describe most of his dialogue in this episode.

The rest of episode six featured Kim stressing about leaving her baby at a nursery for the first time, Roanna stressing that she may have crippled Jonathan and also her stressing that her newly ex boyfriend Luke had just got her seventeen year old daughter pregnant.  There was also the revelation that Rosie had developed a social anxiety phobia about going outside.  I did wonder during this series if Kay Mellor had developed an anxiety disorder about having this character in the show anymore because compared to the first series, I found it somewhat puzzling that she hardly seemed to be in this second one at all.

I did not hate this second series because I watched all of it but like I said at the top, it just lacked the spark and originality of the first one for me.  Episode five was the strongest episode by a country mile.  This was the one where midwife Vicky was found not guilty of any negligence at work.  This happiness was juxtaposed by the dramatic ending as Roanna mistakenly knocked over Jonathan in her car   It was dramatic tense stuff which reminded me why I enjoyed the first series so much.  I therefore looked forward to seeing the series finale the week after, but rather than enjoyment I found it to be a bit of a letdown.

The best two characters and actors in this show were not in this second series enough.  My favourite female actress in it is Katherine Parkinson who plays blogger/teaching assistant Kim Hall.  She was in the first episode a lot but then hardly seemed to be in it much again until episode six.  Rick Manning played by Will Mellor is the best male character in it however yet again like Kim/Katherine I thought he was underused.  Rick had gone from doing a dramatic attempted robbery in the first series, to then just delivering pizzas in the second(I rest my case, your honour).

At the end of the first series of In The Club I was hoping it would be recommissioned and it duly was.  After now seeing this second series then my verdict is one of indifference with regards to wanting anymore of it to be made.  Since it finished I have read that writer Kay Mellor intends to leave it awhile should a third series be given the go ahead. She stated how the story could next be picked up when the characters children have just started at school.  I think this is the correct decision by her because at the moment BIRTHS AND BABIES on the TV equals BOREDOM for me! 3/5.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in BBC DRAMA, BBC ORIGINAL DRAMA, BBC1, DRAMA, EMOTION, ENTERTAINMENT, NHS, POPULAR CULTURE, TELEVISION, THE ARTS, TV, TV REVIEW, UK TV, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

RESOLUTE, RELENTLESS REG! ‘REG’ – A REVIEW.

Reg Keys : “A five hundred strong mob armed to the teeth baying for blood, came after my son and he had fifty bullets and no radio.  Now I can accept that just about, but if I find out this war didn’t have to be fought and he died for nothing I will never accept that, I will never let that die”.

This was a BBC1 drama by Robert Pugh and the always brilliant writer Jimmy McGovern, based on the remarkable true story of how one grieving father took on the then serving British Prime Minister Tony Blair in the 2005 general election.  The man in question is Reg Keys, whose son(Tom Keys) died of a brutal death whilst serving the British Army during the second Iraqi conflict.    Reg was enraged regarding the circumstances of his son’s death and the reasons as to why Britain went to war.  It was a sort of modern day David versus Goliath tale but the difference here being that ultimately Goliath(Tony Blair) won.

After two viewings my opinion is that this drama is a really excellent piece of work.  I do not think it was faultless, nevertheless I did find it a very rewarding watch.  It was provocative, thought provoking and intensely moving throughout.  Admittedly, it was extremely biased against Blair and the second Iraq war but it was not too biased .  I never felt that Reg’s views ever reached the stage of say being ‘anti-war propaganda’, it is a credit to both writers that I never felt like I was being preached too.

Before seeing this drama I held Tim Roth in the highest regard as a British actor.  My opinion of him has grown even greater now because I thought he gave an absolutely exceptional performance in his portrayal of Reg Keys.  It was a somewhat understated performance but one that also at the same time had a purposeful directness to it.  I really liked Reg.  It was a controlled performance in terms of aggression rather than him ever getting hysterical, which as a consequence gave his very emotional speech at the end greater impact.

As I have praised Tim Roth, then it would be unfair of me not to also mention the fantastic performance that actress Ann Maxwell Martin gave as Sally Keys(Reg’s Wife). I guess there was a danger with this drama that it was just all going to be about Reg and Tim Roth’s portrayal of him.  Reg was obviously the lead character however it never came across like a one man show.  Sally and Ann’s superb portrayal of her, were just as important to the story as Reg and Tim were.  Her realistic portrayal of a mother who was struck down by immense grief needs applauding.  We saw that Sally’s solace to the agony of losing her son was drink.  Her character was a great counter balance to Reg at times too.  For example, she disputed with Reg the comment he made to Tom when they first went to visit his coffin.  She argued with him that how could he say he was proud of Tom when he had not achieved anything in life?

A point that needs further expanding upon is how crucial it was to have included alternative viewpoints to that of Reg’s, i.e not a full ninety minutes of Blair bashing.  It added credibility to the piece because not everybody at the time saw Reg as a hero and so it was an important acknowledgement.  The best example of this was when we saw Reg in Sedgefield knocking on doors during his general election campaigning .  We saw one resident claim Reg was stupid for allowing Tom to join the army due to it being too dangerous. Another man had sympathy for the Iraqi fighters that killed Tom and stated how he thought Reg was a “mug”.

For the most part I thought the special effects worked really well.  I am thinking here of the memorial service at St Paul’s Cathedral where archive footage of the actual event was mixed with the drama footage, which thus made it look like the characters in this drama were actually there at the time of this real event(alongside Blair and others).  The most impressive sight of the whole drama for me was when such special effects were used again at the count.  It actually looked as if Tim Roth as Reg, was standing alongside Tony Blair as the results of the election were declared.  This added a sense of spectacle to the drama.  The only time such special effects did not work was near the beginning of the programme, when drama footage was mixed with archive news footage showing the six dead bodies being carried from the warplane after being returned home.  It did not look like the actors in this drama were there at the time.  I would even go as far to say that this brief section looked a bit amateurish.

Speaking of any criticisms that I had of Reg, then I just wonder whether it might have been better to have shown this drama in two parts rather than just one long one.   A ninety minute drama about the emotional subject of the Iraq war required a very committed watch from viewers, maybe it demanded too much concentration from some? I have to admit that around the time Sally had been rushed into hospital my mind had started to wander and think about other things.  Then again, in my second viewing my mind did not wander off the narrative at all so maybe this criticism of mine is completely unwarranted.  I just wonder if it would have been better to have broken off for the ten o’clock news so viewers had a little break, rather than the news being delayed by thirty minutes like it was.  Critics of this suggestion of mine would no doubt argue that this would have ruined the emotional climax that was building in the piece.

Another small criticism I have was to do with the poor sound quality at times.  I do not mean to go all Happy Valley on you(famously hit the headlines when it aired this year for having muffled sound) but I did struggle in places to make out what was being said.  In my second viewing I realised the sound quality was fine and that it was the Brummie accent of some the characters that was my struggle.  Tim Roth was fine but I did have some issues with some of the diction from Ann Maxwell Martin and Elliott Tittensor(who played Richard Keys).

During his speech at the count we saw Reg Keys say the following words,

Reg : “If this war had been justified by international law then I would have grieved, not campaigned.  If weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq, again I would have grieved not campaigned”.

In the light of watching this superb drama, I am ashamed to admit to you that at the 2005 general election I saw Reg Keys as a bit of an irritant.  I saw him as a man who was acting somewhat irrationally due to suffering from the immense torment of grief.  This drama has completely changed my view of this man.  Reg’s story is one that should be celebrated as this drama did so brilliantly well.  What Reg did back then for the love of his son Tom and wife Sally, it was indeed heroic.  I came away from this drama feeling proud of Reg Keys.  I also came away feeling proud of our British democracy, that it enabled David(Reg) to take on Goliath(Tony Blair).  Reg was RESOLUTE and RELENTLESS in wanting justice for his son….bravo to him and bravo to Robert Pugh and Jimmy McGovern for writing this wonderful piece of television. 4/5.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in BBC, BBC DRAMA, BBC ORIGINAL DRAMA, BBC1, death, DRAMA, EMOTION, ENTERTAINMENT, FAMILY, grief, POPULAR CULTURE, TELEVISION, THE ARTS, TRUE STORIES, TV, TV REVIEW, UK TV | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘I WANT MY WIFE BACK’ AND A SECOND SERIES……….JUST ABOUT! Series review.

I have conflicting views about this sit-com. Part of me thinks not much happened in it and that Murray(Ben Miller’s character), was a poor man’s Basil Fawlty.  On the other hand, I did find it funny to watch at times.  The fact I watched all six episodes and never gave up on it must mean that I enjoyed it to some degree.  It was good without being exceptional, watchable without being incredible and amusing without ever being hilarious.

To coin and adapt that famous old Roy Walker catchphrase ‘SAY WHAT YOU SEE’, the title of this sit-com really could not have made it any clearer regarding what this show was all about. In episode one we saw Bex(Caroline Catz) leaving her husband Murray because she claimed he was too much of a workaholic and that she never saw enough of him.  Apart from that and hearing ‘I need some space to sort my head out'(about twenty times), that is all we had to go on as to why she felt the need to leave him.  The rest of the series then took the form of Murray trying to woo her back into his arms.  As there were six episodes to this then I had a funny feeling this was going to be a six week wooathon.

Nareesha : ” It’s just as acting head of department I ought to do it but I’m not very good with funny stories or jokes”.

Some of the supporting cast worked and some did not.  Intentional office bore Nareesha(so boring she was meant to be funny…but wasn’t) just irritated me for the first five episodes.  I did not find her funny whatsoever.  Therefore, when she uttered that line above about not being funny or any good at telling jokes, I thought ‘blimey, couldn’t have put it any better myself that’.  To my great surprise though this character did make me chuckle in this final episode.  Her overly boring speech about the weather being ‘STILL OVERCAST’ on the first three days she met Murray made me laugh, together with her later quizzing Murray whether she was sexually satisfying their boss Curtis enough?

I know at the start I made a somewhat disparaging comment about Murray being a poor imitation of the great Basil Fawlty character from Fawlty Towers, nevertheless this comparison does have some long legs to it(quite literally in both their cases).  Murray’s dialogue and the delivery style of Ben Miller reminded me so much of Basil Fawlty(aka John Cleese) at times. The best example of this was in episode six when Murray addressed some guests at his in-laws wedding anniversary party. For example, Murray stated,

“Ladies and gentlemen, I just need to make a small announcement.  I think one or two of you may have got the wrong end of the…err…..pregnancy testing stick.  Err Don and Paula are indeed going to be grandparents but the bearer of said child is, is, is not in fact Bex, it’s their other daughter Keeley…..er Keeley is having the baby, ah here she is so congratulations to Keeley”.

The way Ben Miller paused and gesticulated throughout this dialogue, it was sooooo Basil Fawlty ish. It reminded me of that episode of Fawlty Towers when an exasperated Basil kept addressing all the guests about a fire drill.

Episode four of I Want My Wife Back also strongly reminded me of Fawlty Towers.  This was the one where Murray went for a meal with Bex but somehow at the same time also ended up having a meal with his new love rival Julian.  The way Murray kept running from table to table getting more and more exasperated and panic stricken as he tried to prevent them from bumping into one another, it was so reminiscent of Basil Fawlty type behaviour.  I am thinking in particular here of the Gourmet Night episode in Fawlty Towers where Basil runs around like a headless chicken trying to serve duck.

I could take the Fawlty Towers analogy a stage further and argue that Murray’s brother Grant(Kenneth Collard) was the Manuel character(much smaller in both physical and professional statue to Murray), and Murray’s father-in-law had certain similarities to the famous old Major in Fawlty Towers. I need to make it clear here that in no way, shape, or form I am saying that I Want My Wife Back is anywhere near as good as Fawlty Towers.  My point is though that both in terms of the script and the acting, it is clear that I Want My Wife Back was heavily influenced by the legendary Fawlty Towers.  I would argue this influence was too much perhaps because once I had recognised this link then it started to play on my mind all of the time whilst watching it.  I even thought of Basil Fawlty again as Murray ran after Bex dressed up in all his scuba diving gear towards the end of episode six. The flippers accentuated Ben Miller’s long legs just like running up the hotel’s stairs magnified the amusing sight of John Cleese’s very long legs.

I Want My Wife Back ended with the happy ending that I had craved six weeks for, maybe ‘craved’ is overdoing it tad…..hoped.  I would have felt like exploding if there had not been a happy reunion between Murray and Bex.  These days it really irritates me how lots of new shows don’t seem to conclude the way they should, namely because they have an eye on hopefully getting recommissioned for a follow-up series.  Bex embracing Murray at the end was a fitting ending to an OK series.

I want a second series of I Want My Wife Back………JUST ABOUT, but my hunch is that this show will be declared NULL AND VOID by the BBC powers that be! 3/5.

 

 

 

Posted in BBC, BBC COMEDY, BBC1, COMEDY, ENTERTAINMENT, POPULAR CULTURE, screenplay, TELEVISION, THE ARTS, TV, TV REVIEW, UK TV, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Killer Women with Piers Morgan – Series 1 – Episode 2 – INTERESTING, INTRIGUING AND YET AGAIN….IMPARTIAL PIERS!

The opening to this second episode was that dramatic that I half expected the famous duff duff drum beat from Eastenders to start playing any second.  My jaw nearly dropped to the floor as we were informed how in 2008 a woman was convicted of murdering her own daughter by the testimony of her seven year old son.  This second installment was interesting, intriguing and Piers yet again was impressively impartial throughout.  Even though the first programme had a stronger emotional impact on me, this second one nevertheless was definitely a worthwhile watch.

Prosecutor : “Can you tell me what a lie is”?

AJ : “It’s not the truth”.

Prosecutor : “Can you tell me what the truth is”?

AJ : “It’s not a lie”.

This courtroom dialogue above weighed heavy on the heart because AJ is the seven year old boy who testified against his mother in court back in 2008.  This first case that Piers looked at took place in Florida and involved Amanda Lewis being convicted of drowning her young daughter Adrianna Hutto.  Amanda to this day we were told still protests her innocence of this crime.  Again like last week, the case was presented to us via a good mix of archive footage (such as courtroom footage, police questioning) together with present day interviews.

What needs to be applauded here is how Piers challenged almost everything he was told.  He challenged Amanda over certain aspects of the case.  For example, why did Adrianna’s bedroom have a strong odour of urine to it he quizzed her? Why would AJ make up such a story? Likewise though he strongly pressed the people who firmly believe Amanda is guilty of this crime. He pressed Chief Prosecutor Larry Basford and Holmes County Sheriff Dennis Lee about the validity of AJ’s testimony.  Piers put it to them that there were inaccuracies in some of statements that AJ had said.

The second murder case Piers looked at was that of Jimmy Joste.  In Texas 2006 former beauty queen Rhonda Glover was convicted of his murder, her lover at the time. Dramatic tension was then amplified by us being informed how women are three times more likely as men to kill someone they love.  As with the first case both sides were presented to us.  We heard Rhonda profess that she had acted in self defence, contrasting with people from law enforcement who saw her as a cold calculated murderer.

What I liked about this documentary was that there was a moving poignancy to it like there was in the first episode.  Stylistically, there is almost something slightly poetic about seeing a bright sunny clear day in the present tense, against then being told about the grave subject of murder in the past tense.  Poignancy was also conveyed through words and the most moving thing I heard in this programme came from Jimmy Joste’s former business partner Danny Davis towards the end.  Regarding how he now felt towards Rhonda, Danny told Piers,

“I’ll say hello to her, I’ll sit down and have lunch with her, you know I’m not going to hate her.  You forgive a lot when you get older, you don’t have time for hate anymore”.

I guess it was not just what Danny said but also how he said it in such a wistful way that moved me so much.

I have said up to this point how I liked the impartially of Piers Morgan in this programme.  He never tried to shove his own personal opinions about the cases and ‘killer women’ he interviewed down our throats for instance.  The cases were presented us and we were left to make up our own minds about them. What differed though here with these two cases from the Erin Caffey case that we saw in episode one, was that both of the women spoke about their innocence of being convicted of murder.  Therefore, I know I am about to somewhat contradict myself but I thus wanted to hear how Piers felt about them at the end.   I think maybe the programme was a bit too much too impartial if you get my point? I would have just liked a subtle summing-up by Piers or a brief conclusion upon how he felt towards them, i.e what was his hunch about them being guilty or not? With a slightly less neutral Piers then the documentary would have had more purpose in my view.

Another small criticism I have is to ask why both episodes were done in America about American ‘killer women, does Britain not have such women(I’m sure we do)? I am pretty certain this decision was to do with there being no archive court footage in the UK, tighter British gun laws and Britain being a much smaller place thus meaning there were less cases to choose from.  Were cases solely in America examined because some deem crimes over there to be more sensationalistic compared to ones here in Britain?

In the main though I believe this second episode was a good follow up to an utterly compelling first part the week before.  I think this show is the best thing Piers Morgan has done on television in a very long time.  If there are more episodes of this to come in the future then I will no doubt watch them. INTERESTING, INTRIGUING AND IMPARTIAL……yes you read that correctly, am I talking about Mr Piers Morgan! 3/5.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in death, documentary, EMOTION, ITV1, POPULAR CULTURE, TELEVISION, THE ARTS, TV, TV REVIEW, UK TV, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Killer Women with Piers Morgan – Episode one review. FORGIVENESS AND UNCONDITIONAL LOVE!

In a similar style and vein to the ITV1 Sir Trevor McDonald documentaries of recent years, here we saw Piers Morgan look at the grave but intriguing subject of ‘killer women’. Piers unquestionably is a hugely polarizing figure(being so opinionated is partly how he makes a living).  Nevertheless, if you just allow yourself to ignore his somewhat controversial articles and Twitter ramblings and just judge him solely on being a serious broadcaster as I did here in this programme, then in my opinion he is an excellent broadcaster.  He is not as skilled a performer as say Louis Theroux is and nor does he hold the same current affairs gravitas of Sir Trevor McDonald, however I thought in this first part of two documentaries that he has done on this subject he came across very well.

In this first episode Piers found himself in Texas where he examined the case of Erin Caffey.  In 2008 Erin was arrested along with three accomplices for the murder of her Mum Penny, as well as her two younger brothers Matthew and Tyler.  Now twenty-four years old, Piers went to visit Erin in Hilltop Prison Unit Texas.  As well as visiting Erin, Piers also met up with her father Terry who was the only one to have survived the horrific attack.  Terry had not been back to the site of the burned down house for many years, it was there where he and Piers emotionally discussed what had happened on that fateful night.

“When you took the totality of all the circumstances, it really was the most disturbing thing I had ever seen”(State Prosecutor).

These damning words from the State Prosecutor were greatly juxtaposed against Erin being so respectful and demure when Piers met her.  She seemed like such a polite young lady who you would never have thought could have been involved in such an awful crime.  I thought Piers handled his interview with her just about right.  He never lectured her and was polite with her without ever being too polite.  He probed her with some uncomfortable questioning when he needed too without going over the top.  I thought the tone of his interaction with her was near enough spot-on and so he needs commending for this.

“So it has been a struggle to finally get to that place where I could finally forgive myself”(Terry Caffey, father of Erin).

With this quote in mind, the most moving part of the documentary for me was when forgiveness and unconditional love were talked about.  Erin emotively revealed how her Dad(Terry) had promised her unconditional love despite what had happened.  Terry stated how at first he had wanted her two male accomplices to serve the death penalty.  However, due primarily to his strong faith he told Piers how he had now forgiven them(they are now currently serving life sentences instead).  He blamed himself massively for not protecting his family that night.  His tale about him reading Penny’s words in a notebook where she called him her hero, was a particularly poignant watch.

From a documentary standpoint, then I thought it was impressive how police interviews and media footage from the time of the event were combined with the present day stuff.  The 2008 police interviews of the four suspects were crucial in helping us gain a further insight into the events that had taken place back then.

There was not a lot wrong with this documentary in my view.  Nevertheless, I would have liked it explaining though by Piers at some stage as to why he chose to look at Erin’s case in particular above all the other ones out there? I am also not quite sure exactly what the primary purpose of this programme was?  Was it purely just to inform us of this historical criminal case or was there a bigger agenda at play here? Was it to challenge the misconception that some have about murderers i.e,  not just men commit murder in society but women do too? You could also make the argument that it was about forgiveness as well as there being an anti-capital punishment message in it.

Overall, a well made documentary by all concerned and one that encourages me to watch part two.  My overriding emotion at the end it was one of great sadness.  Sadness for the victims that are no longer with us and yet also sadness for Erin herself, such an unnecessary waste of a life.   I leave you with a really moving line then that was shown on a piece of furniture about a third of the way into this programme.  I think it beautifully encapsulates the heart rending and very emotive tone that was present throughout this documentary,

“Because someone we love is in heaven….there’s a little bit of HEAVEN in our home”.

4/5.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in documentary, ENTERTAINMENT, POPULAR CULTURE, TELEVISION, TRUE STORIES, TV, TV REVIEW, UK TV, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘In The Club’ – episode 2 review. SURPRISES APLENTY!

When I was a teenager I used to play cricket for a junior club side that my late father was the coach of.  I know for a fact that some of the other lads thought I was only being picked because he was the coach,i.e bias. This I hasten to add was complete and utter NONSENSE you understand, I was that good that I could have been the next Sir Ian Botham….HONEST(I’m NOT being honest). Sadly for me though I also had the same mental toughness as “Nervous Nerys” from Only Fools and Horses so I was never destined to make it at a very high level playing sport(don’t it still hurts…..not really). Stay with me with me now after this rather strange opening to a TV review,  because there is a very tenuous link coming up here with the second episode of In The Club…… I promise.

The tenuous link is that one of the things that has irritated me slightly whenever viewing a drama by Kay Mellor is that usually a member of her family pops up in them, usually her daughter actress Gaynor Mellor(or Faye). I must declare here that I have nothing personally against Gaynor Mellor because she is a perfectly good actress in her own right. Nevertheless, her connection and regular appearance in her Mum’s shows really started to grate on me awhile back, so much so I was pretty shocked that she never appeared in the first series of In The Club.  With this in mind then, last Tuesday night I just got settled to watch episode two of In The Club and whose name did I see credited as the writer just before the narrative resumed…..no other than Gaynor Mellor herself(cue me rolling my eyes in frustration……argh).  I was going to see past this though and view it with an open mind I told myself.

Overall, I thought this episode was just OK. Some of it held my attention but I also found some bits of it boring too.  On occasions I found myself drifting off and thinking about other stuff and then switching back on to it.  It was the first time whilst watching it, that I wondered to myself if there were loads of women out there lapping this up unlike me. I felt slightly alienated as a male viewer. I did not hate it but it just felt more like a soap opera at times than a prime time TV drama. i.e content more appealing to women, a very female programme.  Most of the narrative failed to dramatically grip me, even the bits that were clearly supposed too.

This episode was all about surprises.  For example, Rick just back from prison was surprised to find out his wife Dianne had become the Mary Poppins of the north whilst he had been away. Roanna was shocked to find out that her ex husband was capable of being nice to her after all(not sure I bought his new ‘nice personality’ transplant), and Kim was still in shock that she was enjoying sleeping with her hunky man(I bought that bit).  As viewers, I guess the two most surprising bits were Roanna snogging her former nasty ex-husband and midwife Vicky becoming embroiled in a case where she discovered a new Mother had passed away suddenly who was under her care.

Talking of Vicky, I am the only one that finds the disappearance of her fella and father of her new baby a bit hard to believe?  We are supposedly talking here about a clever Consultant Gynecologist fella(Dr Bellingham) who had just become a father, yet we are expected to believe that he’s left his baby and job and gone travelling half way around the world trying to find that woman to whom he married just for the money(when a medical student) so he can get a divorce….then are we?  I think I am right with this storyline and if so then it is about as believable as me saying at the start of this review that I could have been the next Ian Botham.

I am still to be won over or convinced by the new characters Maxine and Shelly, especially the former.  I still do not know enough about them yet to care about them.  I guess in the coming weeks all will be revealed regarding the baby Maxine supposedly had in the toilets, but I do wish their storylines would get a move on.

All in all then a drama still worth sticking with however I do sense my interest in it is waning somewhat.  I need episode three to draw me back in like I once was before, I want to be excited once more about watching IN THE CLUB!! 3/5.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in BBC DRAMA, BBC ORIGINAL DRAMA, DRAMA, ENTERTAINMENT, POPULAR CULTURE, TELEVISION, THE ARTS, TV, TV REVIEW, UK TV, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment